| ▲ | minimaxir 3 hours ago | |||||||
Even without the politics, Elon has shown that he will weaponize his platforms against people/companies he personally doesn't like (e.g. specific bans/demotions to external sites like Substack and Bluesky). Using Grok is therefore a supply chain risk and it's not nearly good enough to offset that risk. | ||||||||
| ▲ | dimgl 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
As opposed to what was happening before, on Twitter? | ||||||||
| ▲ | alex1138 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I do just want to focus on the 'even without the politics' asterisk though because sometimes there is a risk people think everyone on x side (x meaning 'a given side', not x.com) is wrong You can claim Elon bought x as some sort of power trip. Fine. Willing to entertain it, I have no dog in the fight. I'm not a member of the Elon fan club. And yet Twitter (under Dorsey though I don't think he was involved) was banning tons of people under guises of 'misinfo' that wasn't misinfo | ||||||||
| ||||||||