Remix.run Logo
WhitneyLand 4 hours ago

Much better than it was before but it’s still significantly weaker than a direct chat.

For example I asked

“Why should LLM attention use dot product instead of cosine similarity, being that we often hear vector magnitude does not encode most of the useful information needed”?

The voice response was directionally right but lacked detail and was a little hand wavy.

The answer to the same question in a text chat was much higher quality.

The voice response replied “let me think about that…” so it appears to be invoking 5.5 as advertised, but it’s definitely weaker.

I had reasoning set the same for both.

athyuttamre 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

A lot of this is steerable! Our current personality is optimized for brainstorming and conversations, but you can provide custom instructions to ask it to go deep and give you info-dense or more technical answers.

bariswheel an hour ago | parent [-]

I found myself probing more and more questions to have it do that, I wish it could remember to provide details answers, I thought the replies were way too short and hand-wavy like one of the prior comments suggested.

WarmWash 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I would naturally assume they cut the background thinking level to the minimum. It's a halting problem question and with in text 5.5 with max thinking will chew on a question for 5-10 minutes sometimes. That would make a pretty awkward conversation.