| ▲ | Terr_ 2 hours ago | |
Over many years I've tried to (unsuccessfully) coin the phrase "Design for deletion." The code in front of you works today, but will become unfit for purpose and un-salvageable, and we want to ensure that when that inevitable end happens, there is a sane and safe way to systematically chop it out and replace it with something else, something you are not capable of predicting. There's substantial overlap with general principles like loose-coupling and modularity, but the framing changes how people apply them: Instead of trying to create durable Amazing-Thing which will be used for many years by people amazed at your foresight making it "flexible" and "modular" and "customizable", you focus on creating Inoffensive-Thing which can be easily killed off or dismantled for useful parts. | ||
| ▲ | darkteflon an hour ago | parent [-] | |
Love this framing, thank you. | ||