Would have been worth a consideration if it could have been used beyond it's own harness. Unfortunately, doesn't seem to be the case.

https://x.com/theodormarcu/status/2074896486047834380

▲

mrinterweb 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I really don't want harness lock-in. I am trying to decouple myself from Claude Code now. I love the model of OpenRouter and being able to switch models at will let's your harness focus on your personal tooling and you can easily switch to the flavor of the month LLM with a single slash command instead of rewiring your entire workflow to use a harness to use a model.

I like Cerabras, but I really wish they would make more of their hosted models generally available.

▲

2001zhaozhao 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Harness-wrapper tools that support multiple harnesses and allow sharing workspace features (skills, slash commands, etc.) between them will be meta.

▲

RussianCow an hour ago | parent [-]

Ironically, Devin Desktop is one of those tools. It supports any harness that supports ACP (which is most of them)—you can use Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, etc from the Devin Desktop UI.

I'm currently experimenting with OpenSpec[0] as the "framework" and using different subscriptions for different parts of the spec-driven process: Opus via Claude Code for exploration, Devin SWE for building, and GLM 5.2 via the Z.ai Coding Plan for verification. I don't love having to mix and match harnesses, but in practice it's barely more effort than switching models.

[0]: https://openspec.dev/

	▲	thereitgoes456 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Is that surprising? It is standard "embrace, extend, extinguish" from a company not in a strong enough position to do the third one.

▲

esafak 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Ugh, that changes everything. If I wanted an arranged marriage I could go back to Claude Code.