Non-profits usually don't "compete" at least in the economic sense. They exist for a charitable purpose that isn't normally well-served by the competitive market.

▲

throwaway27448 an hour ago | parent [-]

First of all, charity is a christian concept that has no role in modern secular society. Anything worth doing out of the kindness of our hearts is worth doing collectively without expecting individuals do disproportionately sacrifice.

Second, of course zero-margin processes have an economic role. That is what market efficiency looks like. The entire point of competition is to produce these economic processes. The american brain can't fathom getting their money's worth lol

▲

akramachamarei an hour ago | parent [-]

> Anything worth doing out of the kindness of our hearts is worth doing collectively without expecting individuals do disproportionately sacrifice.

What are you saying here? Like, how are you distinguishing individual charity from the thing "worth doing collectively"? Presumably you don't consider individuals voluntarily giving and thus voluntarily organizing insofar as they coordinate to be the same as collective action, so I can't help but wonder which part is different, and I worry it's the voluntary bit....

	▲	37 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	throwaway27448 35 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yes. I think people should be forced at gunpoint to contribute to their society. Typically that gunpoint is the state, but we seem to be allergic to having a functional society. Why be proud of your country when you can be a narcissist who steps over the homeless on the way to your job?