Remix.run Logo
_doctor_love 3 hours ago

We were in an age of reading? I gave up about 10 years ago on people as readers. I have recommended so many books and articles to software people over the years and it's honestly depressing how many people have told me they don't like to read.

Like...you're a programmer? And you don't like to read? I assumed that people who enjoy software would be into intellectual stimulation but I've learned that this is wrong. More what seems to be the case is people have enjoyed coding as a kind of video game.

But this generalizes to the general population too. Marshall McLuhan's message remains a very important medium.

GrumpyYoungMan 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> "I assumed that people who enjoy software would be into intellectual stimulation but I've learned that this is wrong."

It was truer in the 1980s-1990s, when programming was not a prestigious or high paying job and computers were much cruder and required much more skill to get adequate performance from them. Generally, aspiring hackers were very well read people.

There were, of course, corporate programmers doing business programming back then too but they weren't considered hackers and wouldn't even have wanted themselves to be considered hackers.

SoftTalker 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Progamming in a corporate/business environment was not prestigious or high paying then either. It was a decent job, don't get me wrong, but something more similar to accounting or other back-office work in terms of pay and prestige.

inanutshellus an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

if you wear yourself out mentally all day as part of your occupation, digging into a "good" book is often too much work.

As anecdata: My wife has a "brainy" occupation and her brilliant sister does not. Correspondingly, my wife has no interest in "brainy" books in her free time whilst her sister is always recommending new 900 page tomes.

SkyPuncher 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I love learning, but I hate reading. Most of my learning now is via audio books while I'm doing something else.

In my view, software development is mostly skimming and pattern recognization. Very little actual, deep reeding in my opinion.

WhrRTheBaboons 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>Most of my learning now is via audio books while I'm doing something else.

You're not actually learning anything then. Memorizing trivia, sure. But not actually learning.

pizzalife 2 hours ago | parent [-]

That seems like a pretty controversial take. Why would you not be able to learn things orally?

mrweasel an hour ago | parent | next [-]

You absolutely can learn orally, what I'd question is if you can do so without active listening. Listing to anything while doing, well anything, is pretty pointless to me, I tends to not listen and not absorb anything. I can barely listen to a podcast while working out, I miss huge gaps where my brain just isn't listening.

nkrisc 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It’s the focus that’s important. If you’re listening while doing other things, you’re not really focusing on it.

tekla 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You're not actually using your brain to do much, just as OP said, sort-of badly memorizing trivia.

xpct 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I love learning, but I hate reading.

Correction: you love the feeling of consuming information, not learning.

smrq an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Imagine gatekeeping learning. I suppose the blind are incapable of it, then? Or is taking in information via the fingers somehow more valid than via the ears?

wuliwong an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Reading is not the only modality for learning.

mibsl an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Why not go further - learning is doing, not consuming (reading, watching, listening)?

naikrovek 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

How in the heck can you plausibly correct someone else like that? You (almost certainly) don’t know that person, even in passing.

People can learn from watching a documentary just as well as they can learn from reading, but reading teaches you how to interpret language as you continue reading, and other forms of information delivery convey understanding of their own mediums in their own ways. I would not have learned how to quickly spot a terrible documentary over a great one if I had not watched so many in my life. It doesn’t mean I didn’t learn anything because I watched and listened instead of read, it just means that I didn’t read the documentaries.

Pro tip: don’t correct people about their own lives.

xpct an hour ago | parent [-]

I'll admit fault for my remark, but I'll stand by the point I meant to express.

Part of disagreement probably stems from what type of 'learning' we're discussing. In my view, at the broadest sense that we can define 'learning', is incorporating information about our surroundings into our internalized world model. The type of learning I see most valuable personally, is the type that expands this horizon the most, or helps us think in frameworks that break down the least in different contexts.

This type of foundational building often requires deep thought, but is also often deeply rewarding if you get it right. This doesn't require reading by itself, but ruminating and neural rewiring can often be produced by it, if you consume the right content for you. I think it's important to have different experiences, many of which come from consuming different mediums, as well as doing things in real life, but a significant part of knowledge to this day has been passed down by books.

Even if we mean 'learning' to be more similar to 'gathering information', I think it can be most efficiently done by reading, or doing. I don't hold as much disagreement there, nor any judgement, but I wouldn't equate the two. Perhaps a bit pedantic, but I read 'liking learning' beyond the means by which it's achieved, and 'hating reading' reads temperamental to me.

beej71 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Can I ask why you hate reading? Is this a general statement or is it about the quality of programming-related reading in particular?

Kuyawa an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We read, a lot, but not books. We read manuals, get started docs, apis, git repos, AI responses, wikipedia, tik tok comments just for fun, we read constantly and will read till the end of times. That's the way we learn and entertain ourselves, there is no other way around that.

cosmic_cheese 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Given that I have mental bandwidth available, I enjoy a mentally stimulating read (though, the definition of that surely varies between individuals), but people do indeed come into programming from a variety of different angles.

What initially attracted me to programming was the ability it gives one to create. As a kid the idea that a “regular” person like myself could make computer programs — and not just simple CLI toys but full on lovingly crafted, end user friendly complex GUI applications — blew my mind. Programs weren’t like every nearly every other product which only ever came out of some factory that nobody saw themselves.

As such my interest in programming comes with a slant towards practical usability. I don’t do well with abstract concepts without a rock solid grounding real world use case, even though those are intellectual candy for a few subgroups of programmers.

wvenable 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I assumed that people who enjoy software would be into intellectual stimulation but I've learned that this is wrong.

Perhaps the fact that our jobs are intellectual is the problem. I find that at the end of the day I don't have the capacity for intellectual pursuits and I find physical hobbies / activities more relaxing. I suspect the opposite is probably also true.

not-kinsale-joe 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Can you recommend me a book to read?

wcarss 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's difficult to recommend things without knowing a reader's taste, but I blanket recommend The Stars My Destination, by Alfred Bester.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Stars_My_Destination

wuliwong 41 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I saw this recommended by the Bookpilled youtube channel, I just ordered it. \(^-^)/

beej71 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I just read this! Also recommend.

wincy 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Theft of Fire is my favorite book in the last ten years for sure.

https://devoneriksen.com/products/theft-of-fire-orbital-spac...

verzali an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What counts as a good book varies from person to person.

But take a look at anything by Asimov. I have a collection of his short stories and it is a nice read. Oh, and any short story collection by Chekhov.

xpct 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you can stomach older English novels: A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens

engcoach 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Rabbit, Run by John Updike

throw4847285 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How about an Elmore Leonard novel? Very digestible novels from a deceptively skilled craftsman.

mrweasel an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Honestly it doesn't matter much, go grab a random book from goodwill. If you do "need" a recommendation, I'd suggest "Roots", I'm reading it now and it's amazingly well written.

One suggestion I would make is to read something from before 1980. No real reason why, but books from 1900 - 1980 work better for me personally, not sure why.

_doctor_love an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Fiction or non-fiction?

otikik an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You are a programmer? You understand that different firmwares and operative systems work in different ways and excel at different things?

For the record I do like reading. I just don't like all the reading. I tried learning rust by reading the book. Ugh. Horrible for me. Much better experience working on a project of my own. I saw that for some people it worked. Good for them. It didn't for me, and I had to find a different path. I learn by tinkering. Others might learn by copying, or by drawing boxes and arrows. Who am I to judge their firmware?

This is not a bad thing. That's good! Variety in ways of thinking is one of humanity's strengths.

If you find someone who is good at programming but doesn't like reading, try to find out how. You might be able to learn some of their abilities that complement yours.

breezybottom 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Programming probably is more intellectually stimulating than reading fiction novels.

ksenzee 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

As someone with a degree in literature, I'm gonna disagree there. It depends on both the novel and the programming.

GPerson 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It’s not.

Novels are fiction by the way.

breezybottom 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes? What's so important about novels? They're a relatively recent innovation in literature.

retrac 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think a reasonable definition of "novel" is a long-form work in prose, that tells narrative stories, often looking at individual families and characters and their development over time. In that sense, novels are not that novel and there are novels preserved from classical antiquity, India's golden age, and medieval China.

AlotOfReading 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

By what standard are novels "recent"? The earliest novels we have originated not long after the first books (aka codices) appeared. The first modern novel was written at the same time as the king james bible, over 400 years ago.

wbl 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The epic and the play are several thousand years older. Novels are the newest kind of literature, even if it has been a few centuries at this point.

AlotOfReading an hour ago | parent [-]

They're not the newest kind of literature. Arthurian legends and religious canons are two examples of newer forms, neither of which I think would be typically described as "recent." I could also use the novella, and the anecdote as examples instead.

throw4847285 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I see that pedantry is more intellectually stimulating than either programming or reading!

hsuduebc2 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I gave up reading when I got my first portable computer. Not sure why. But after some time I got sick of it and got back to reading and I love it!

For some reason I suddenly got an urge to read long deep fantasy. Storm light archive is perfect for this, I recommend play some fantasy reading music on background. It's a bliss, especially in summer afternoon with cold coffe.

3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
gosub100 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I gave up on reading because the authors want to spend a considerable number of pages telling me the color of the buttons on an imaginary character's outfit. They have no such right to waste my time with (or even worse, charge me money for) that.

AlotOfReading 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No one says "I gave up on eating because restaurants kept serving me spicy food". You just order different food. A short story that's a couple pages long isn't going to waste them describing the color of buttons, and not every novelist is Tolkien.

phyzix5761 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Books have a built in fast-forward feature.

hsuduebc2 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Then maybe you should not read prose. It is about conveying an experience, a story. You might have simply picked a bad author. Personally, I prefer long reads. I understand that some people might not enjoy that style of storytelling, but saying “give up reading” overall is a shame. Try something like Warhammer 40k novels. They are simple, entertaining, and split into shorter parts. What you are describing does not happen there.

beej71 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I read The Goldfinch a while back. Not at all my usual fare. The plot progressed at a snail's pace, but I enjoyed every page of it. (The movie treatment was horribly shallow in comparison, but there's no way they could possibly convey the depth in two hours.)

philipkglass 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I thought that The Goldfinch had a contrived beginning and a weak ending, but a long, delectable middle that made up for both ends. Also try the author's earlier novel The Secret History if you haven't read it yet.