I don't think it was written by an LLM, some things stand out:

The congratulations text is both in English and Japanese. Contains a single heart emoji.

There was an intention to have a cyan to orange gradient, but the range starts in an ANSI block, ends halfway through the 256 color block and 256 terminal colors are not arranged like a gradient at all.

There's no sleep at the end of the loop where I feel like an LLM would add that defensively.

▲

n2j3 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Human here. I added a sleep 0.5 at the end, it's too fast to read otherwise. Makes for a nice terminal screensaver!

	▲	INTPenis 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Hi fellow human, I got the same idea. Just a sleep 0.1 before the echo "" makes it readable. Otherwise it scrolls way too fast.

▲

make3 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"the code is not quite detail oriented enough to be AI", times are changing

	▲	pkilgore 38 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Flawless, completely unnecessary abstraction is a better tell of LLM code than "comment clearly responding to a part of a prompt that I cannot see".
	▲	DaSHacka 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		More like 'not boilerplate-y enough'
	▲	lemagedurage 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Ehh, AI makes plenty mistakes but they have a different vibe to it. In my mind an AI would do something the most popular way even when that's not appropriate. A human might do things in an unpopular way even when that's not appropriate.