Ha! I don't think there was an external complaint. I suspect that was the mic/cameras IN the car alerting support because you were loud and they wanted to make sure you were okay. :)

▲

nojvek 15 hours ago | parent [-]

If you’re screaming for help vs singing on top of your lungs, it’s a minor difference. Worth a check.

▲

ButlerianJihad 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Actually, Waymo explicitly notes that their mics are never activated until Support is on the line (and this is a very noticeable event) even though the video cameras are always monitoring. I mean, the way I was singing, they could probably guess at the audio!

So there is no way that Support heard or listened to the music or singing in-car. In fact, their own material says "mics are off... so sing your heart out!"

So I feel like it was some pedestrian who was perhaps racist or just offended that a Waymo passenger would be enjoying himself so much with Pat Benatar blasting, and just called-in a complaint. It seems the most prosaic explanation. I couldn't explain why Support would proactively just call in "for no reason" without anyone actually complaining about my particular vehicle.

▲

Schiendelman 11 hours ago | parent [-]

I said mic/camera because I wasn't sure - I confirmed it's based on excess movement on the camera.

▲

ButlerianJihad 10 hours ago | parent [-]

But one look at the video would confirm that I was 100% safe and in very good spirits. Why would they interrupt to inquire, if I was just having a good time alone? That makes no sense at all. It’s just a commercial taxi service. Surely there are dozens of customers every night who have a fun time on the way home from nightclubs and bars. There is no need for Support to waste resources by calling in and asking if they are ok.

The only other time that Support has called in to the car is when there was a hailstorm, and I hesitated to start the ride. Of course a passenger causing a delay in service is pretty good justification for calling in.

▲

Schiendelman 9 hours ago | parent [-]

"100% safe and in very good spirits" could also mean extremely intoxicated. :) I think what they did was the right call.

	▲	JohnFen 7 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> I think what they did was the right call. I don't. That's far, far too intrusive.
	▲	ButlerianJihad 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		What in the hell difference does it make if I was? Once again, this is a taxi service. A commercial taxi service mostly spends its time picking up intoxicating passengers and keeping them off the road as drivers. It would not matter if I was intoxicated unless I vomited. Did I vomit? Did they have any reason to call in? Did they ask me any questions when they called in except how I was doing? There was no indication that they thought I was intoxicated and it wouldn't have made any difference whatsoever. I have no idea what you think a taxi company would do remotely to an intoxicated passenger. That is their job and purpose in life to transport intoxicated persons. It may be instructive to point out that my vehicle's route was headed through the middle of a secure military installation. It is the Air National Guard McDowell Mountain civil defense. Obviously, a civilian highway goes past it and there was no problem with anybody driving on this road. But perhaps, cranking up angry and bitter Pat Benatar tracks from the 1980s, and literally asking people to shoot me was inviting people with guns on the side of the road to fire at the vehicle? I can't imagine what else they would do that. But they successfully discouraged me in keeping the windows all the way rolled down. I think if the windows had been rolled up and nobody could hear me or my music from the outside, it would be completely different scene. And probably if I was not passing a secured military installation at the time, also no big deal. Also listening to a song about shooting and guns, probably not a good idea?