| ▲ | mattrighetti 2 hours ago | |
Did a quick research and saw that in 2024 there were around 12k deaths in which one or more drunk drivers were involved. Doesn’t seem like much for a country with around 350 million people. In comparison, drug causes 7x those deaths. Cancer and heart diseases even more. | ||
| ▲ | Klathmon 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
I feel like we have the technology to prevent a car from starting if the driver is significantly impared, but "solving" addiction, cancer, and heart disease are much harder problems. Obviously it would need to be implemented carefully, but I personally would be more than fine blowing into a tube to start my car if it meant saving 12k lives a year with a very low false positive rate. That being said I know it would never be implemented in a sane way in the US, and you would probably have situations like your car insurance automatically increasing due to a faulty sensor, so I'm ultimately against it unless a lot of other stuff changes. But it's still much more possible than "preventing drug addiction" | ||
| ▲ | Gigachad 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
That's already a huge number. But it's ignoring the much larger issue of distracted drivers, usually on their phone. | ||