Zero engagement with anything the post actually says. You've spent more words performing your distaste than it would've taken to read the thing. Recycling slop as a catch all for "I didn't read it" is the real content free contribution here.

▲

subscribed 19 hours ago | parent [-]

LOL, you could at least write your comments yourself.

I said I didn't read (so much for the big gitcha) because if its not designed for human consumption that means it's not worth human time.

I bet someone actually respecting their audience will present findings in a way that's.... palatable, for the lack of the better word.

(I spent some time commenting to add a voice of disagreement for enshittification of the publishing part of the internet. I'm entitled to it as much as you feel entitled to posting your comments)

▲

sozal 15 hours ago | parent [-]

It's not too long for humans, but it seems that it's too long for you maybe because you don't know how to read :) You didn't finish it, so you assumed nobody could. Don't speak for all humans based on your own reading.

Haters like you, who skim other people's comments and pass them off as their own thoughts, are everywhere. I don't have time for it. Try you chance with other posts.

▲

subscribed 12 hours ago | parent [-]

I read people's work, I stop reading AI slop that people say it's their work.

I didn't say I skimmed your comments, no need to lie if you don't have a good response.

You're too enraged people expect some baseline quality from whatever you post. Why is that so much?

	▲	sozal 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It is not the AI slop, it is the benchmark prepared and done by humans which people like you can't understand. You still keep posting slop comments without ZERO concrete argument. And also, I'm not saying you said you skimmed my comments. It doesn't need to be said, it is obvious that you wrote those comments without opening the link by just reading other's comments. That's it!