You forgot the bike lanes that take up road space but nobody uses. Every socialist mayor's favorite anti-car policy.

That's the classic. City is not friendly to bikes or peds, they add bike lanes, city is not friendly to bikes peds or cars.

	▲	unfitted2545 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Cars aren't friendly to cities

stackghost 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>You forgot the bike lanes that take up road space but nobody uses.

Where I live (city in the PNW), bike lanes see heavy use year-round.

	▲	shermantanktop an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Where I live (also a city in the PNW, with a lot of hills) bike lanes see heavy use during the weekday morning commute, and pretty spotty use every other time of day, and during the weekend. Amsterdam is a different kettle of fish entirely. That's what I'd call "heavy."
	▲	TacticalCoder 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Where I live there lots of little hills: the city is made of lots of hills. Even with electric bikes, it's really horrible to drive in the city. But you see bicycles on the bike lanes, lots of bicycles. When it's summer time and when it's not raining. Otherwise the people are all in their cars.

Sabinus 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"Just one more car lane bro it'll fix congestion this time I swear."

	▲	frollogaston 11 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Some cities really do have enough road for the population
	▲	drnick1 27 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yes, because removing car lanes while car usage is growing (due to demographics and urban development) it totally the right approach.

3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]