| ▲ | CGMthrowaway 4 hours ago |
| Don't rule out another Cash for Clunkers. The 2009 program destroyed 1 in 300 cars on the road. The next one could be bigger. Also, 3 in 4 cars on the road today are now in states requiring emissions tests for your annual registration, which can pose a significant (and growing, as standards improve) obstacle for older cars. |
|
| ▲ | pwg 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > which can pose a significant (and growing, as standards improve) obstacle for older cars. At least for my state, the emissions test a car has to pass is whatever it was supposed to have passed when it was fresh off the assembly line. So older cars do not have to pass stricter newer standards that newer cars have to pass. Now, granted, wear and tear will eventually result in an older car not passing its original standard, but at least the standard it has to pass is fixed, rather than a moving target. |
| |
| ▲ | darrylb42 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | BC stopped emission testing 10ish years ago because new cars almost never fail so there wasn't much value continuing the program. | | |
| ▲ | Scoundreller 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Dunno why these programs never took a sampling approach and data-mined which makes/models/years to target the next year/cycle. | | |
| ▲ | projektfu an hour ago | parent [-] | | The only way to have affordable, ubiquitous testing stations is to make it universal. At least, in states that do not also require safety inspections. If only 10,000 cars were tested each year, nobody would buy the equipment. | | |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | frollogaston 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The article is about the EU, but since you brought up US emissions testing... I live in California, only drive mid 2000s cars, and haven't noticed any of the restrictions getting tighter. It's the usual check every 2 years at the same place. Seems my cars are grandfathered into old emissions standards too. And yeah I enjoy having my car shut the hell up and let me drive. |
| |
| ▲ | hnav 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | For mid 2000s, the car is self monitoring so an emissions check is just a visual once over to ensure no physical tampering and a computer readout of emission readiness monitors + firmware checksum for digital tampering. | |
| ▲ | Spooky23 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I’m imagine that’s coming soon. Most new large cars are getting turbos now to meet federal and state standards, the turbos wear faster and I’m sure there will be a desire to validate them. | | |
| ▲ | Scoundreller an hour ago | parent [-] | | Now that my vehicle is approaching 20 years old, I’m so so so happy it has more interior comfort upgrades rather than mechanical ones like 4wd or a turbo. |
| |
| ▲ | trinix912 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There are some German cities (Munich) where you can’t enter the city center with a diesel car that doesn’t meet the EURO 4 standards. EURO 4 is a low bar but there’s really nothing stopping them from eventually implementing it more widely and upping the requirement to EURO 5, 6, etc. | | |
| ▲ | rendx 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I've been driving a 1996 VW diesel van in Germany including Munich, and nowhere anyone ever actually cared about the lack of the sticker. And now, at 30 years of age, it turned "oldtimer", so it is officially exempted. | |
| ▲ | tiagod 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Same in Lisbon, nobody cares. |
| |
| ▲ | reaperducer 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I live in California, only drive mid 2000s cars, and haven't noticed any of the restrictions getting tighter. Last year, or the year before, Texas dropped emissions testing, except in its most populous counties. |
|
|
| ▲ | Dries007 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The emissions tests only test to the level that the car was first registered (or produced) doesn't it? |
| |
| ▲ | hnav 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yup, a bigger issue for old cars trying to pass emissions is that with prices of precious metals, a worn out catalytic converter (diagnostic code P0420 ) means that most of them are mechanically totaled in California, New York, Colorado since they require either OEM or CARB approved replacements. | | |
| ▲ | Scoundreller an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Must be close to actually worthless if they’re not shipping them out-of-state, no? | | |
| ▲ | hnav 25 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, if it's worth more than 4k registered, it'll either be fixed or shipped. California gives you $1200 to junk it, people will come pick it up for $1500 and a lot of times you'll see it pop back up in state because they illegally resuscitated it with a defouler, a used/EPA cat and put it back into circulation. |
| |
| ▲ | Ar-Curunir 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That’s a good thing, yes? | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | levocardia 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Cash for Clunkers was not mandatory |
| |