Remix.run Logo
big85 2 hours ago

The Wikipedia entry on Chat Control doesn't go into enough detail on what exactly it does, only the history of its legislative process. Can someone update it?

rsynnott 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Part of the confusion is that there are two things involved here; 'Chat Control 1', an existing (but expiring) derogation to the ePrivacy Directive which allows, but does not require, providers to scan messages. 'Chat Control 2', which you'll likely have heard more about, would _require_ providers to do this. The wiki article is quite poorly written and implies that 1 is an earlier version of 2, which isn't really the case.

Anyway, this is about Chat Control 1.

cucumber3732842 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's probably line item 156/289 on some intern's list of things to check once a week and make sure it "looks good". Politicians engage in just as much publicity management as big corporations do.

miroljub 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Just assume the worst: all your private messages would be read and shared between all governments and corporations in the world.

big85 2 hours ago | parent [-]

No, I want to know specifically.

SpicyLemonZest 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

You're looking for an answer that doesn't exist. The term "Chat Control" was coined by the opponents of these proposals to express their worst case assumptions; they reject the idea that the specifics matter, because they fear that any kind of chat scanning can be abused in basically the same ways. Supporters of chat scanning proposals don't call them "Chat Control" or view all such proposals as part of a unified whole.

miroljub 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The answer is already specific, but not complete.