| ▲ | datakan an hour ago | |||||||||||||
If the AI is digesting all the philosophy material ever published then why do they need philosophers? | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | genxy an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
That is not what AI is. AI is a powerful tool, a semiautonomous set of wood working tools that still need a master craftsperson to use. You need the tool+genius to drive it. Everyone wants to shoot down AI but they think AI will do everything. Being proud of a creation where someone did style transfer between spongebob and Rembrandt and they think they made art. About as responsible for actual art as just downloading images from google. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | The_Blade an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
knowing all the philosophy every published is not being a philosopher there was literature about 15 years or so ago stating Philosophy as being an uncommonly lucrative course of study, in part citing Reid Hoffman it is a way of thinking | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | yepyoukno an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Philosophy is a living process of integrating ideas. Classical materials are the whetstone upon which the mind is sharpened. Unlike history, where literal established accounts are ideal, in philosophy one is expected to view today (or the future) through the lens of contextual discourse. While there is “no right answer” understanding what the issues are and how the discussion plays out is relevant. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||