| ▲ | jnovek 3 hours ago | |
“The Handmaid’s Tale is a bad book” is a wild take to start with. “I still think, even in these crazy, censorious times, that people who love banned books list are (intentionally or not) hearkening back to an older time when a centralized body could actually prevent access to information.” You don’t think a school library can prevent access to information? Poor people exist. | ||
| ▲ | everdrive 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I figured my chosen examples would be the least popular part of the post. :) I just don't think you can prevent access to information the same way, though. There will be at least one smart phone in the house. There will be friends and relatives with smartphones, with computers, etc. A poor person who lacks the resources to query on youtube for videos or wikipedia for research will also not be able to sit through a full-length novel. [edit] In the 1960s it may yet have been true (despite radio and shortwave) that if your local libraries and shops did not contain a book -- if your friends had never heard of its ideas -- that you would truly remain ignorant of some of the subversive ideas out there. Things just do not work that way these days. Ideas spread faster and farther than ever. You really cannot prevent the spread of information the same way. At best, you can create a culture of censorship around certain information, which is what I believe modern book-banning does. My quibble here is that people seem to treat book-banning as if it's 1890, and the ideas are being killed due to lack of spread. In the modern world, book banning is symbolic and helps to identify ideas as subversive and unwanted -- but they are NOT out of reach. Again, I do not support book banning whatsoever. | ||