Remix.run Logo
mono442 4 hours ago

Isn't much of the science work just taking money for doing basically nothing? I don't think that is a loss for the us.

zipy124 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No. It is for research that wouldn't be funded by companies, since it is either too risky or has too long of a time-horizon. If all academic research was removed from the world you would notice a vast stagnation in technological progress. This can be confirmed by looking at what technologies have come from this process, and what private research built upon public research.

victorbjorklund 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yea, exactly. You should send all your top scientists to Europe. Great idea to get rid of them. Totally just dragging down your country. Send them to Europe.

pjc50 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Hacker News really isn't what it used to be, huh.

karmakurtisaani 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Anti-science crowd found their way here as well.

throwawaypath an hour ago | parent [-]

>Anti-science crowd

"Pregnant men..."

skeledrew 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"Science work" is NOT doing nothing. All the modern conveniences we have today came through such work, which usually go for long stretches of time before payoff.

lefra 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's not for doing nothing, it's for fooling around at the edge of knowledge. Sometimes, very useful stuff emerges.

MITSardine 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You presumably spent 15 or so years in school to learn things of which many only have very indirect applications, and at most a small minority directly applied to your career.

Should we similarly get rid of mandatory education? Most of it is useless after all.

estearum 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For real. How much more do we need to spend to learn that plants crave Brawndo?

beng-nl 18 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

You are motivating me to get enough reputation points to be allowed to downvote.