| ▲ | ttul a day ago |
| How much time have you spent with Fable? We're in new territory here. It does not create messes. |
|
| ▲ | nozzlegear a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| > We're in new territory here. > It does not create messes. ? |
|
| ▲ | ubercore a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Anecdote, yes, but I am _right now in the middle of helping Fable clean up a mess_. Complex code is hard and Fable still makes mistakes. |
|
| ▲ | what a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| >this time it’s different! Same thing people claim every time a new model is released, yet never seems to be true. |
| |
| ▲ | int_19h a day ago | parent [-] | | It was true every time though. The capacity of frontier models to tackle complicated issues has improved immensely. I still remember the first time I saw a model do a non-trivial issue end to end, and that was less than two years ago. Now they can genuinely do whole projects with human only as a supervisor / quality checker. Do they still make mistakes? Sure. So do humans, though, so it would be unrealistic to expect perfection. The question is: does Fable make fewer mistakes than the median human coder? And at this point I'm genuinely not sure anymore. |
|