| ▲ | openquery 2 hours ago | |||||||
> I agree with your sentiment (about the noise), however I think this over simplifies it a bit. We may get AI that is super-human at frontier research and dramatically accelerates the pace, and still have to wait decades before it disrupts the job market (or maybe never displaces all work). I don't see why that's the case when you have super-human researchers on tap. There are indeed physical (supply chain-y) issues to deal with but isn't the whole point that: 1. Super-human at AI research + scaling to millions of instances will probably result in super-intelligence in everything which is not AI research. (a subset of which is white-collar work) 2. Use that super-intelligence to solve any supply-chain issues you might be facing. > And we may just find that the human mind is way more capable than we thought and even with accelerating research it's just a harder problem than anyone expected, even algorithmically. I hope so but whenever I do, I feel like I'm coping hard and not dealing with the facts. I'm not saying we're there yet - I'm saying the trend lines are clear. | ||||||||
| ▲ | BobbyJo an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> Use that super-intelligence to solve any supply-chain issues you might be facing. I think this is where a lot of people's thinking goes awry. Unlimited intelligence doesn't mean unlimited resources or instantaneous implementation. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | grttw1 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
“I don't see why that's the case when you have super-human researchers on tap. ” Hahahaa this is what AI psychosis looks like | ||||||||