|
| ▲ | 0x1d7 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| But will this put a damper in ALPRs from reading cellular/bluetooth radios? https://www.thedrive.com/news/license-plate-cameras-will-soo... |
|
| ▲ | FireBeyond 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The FCC might be surprised to learn that they do not, in fact, regulate cellphones. |
|
| ▲ | iamnothere an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Not if the Supreme Court says “no” after a successful challenge. |
| |
| ▲ | stickfigure 43 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Of course. We're all here speculating on how the courts will rule. We can come back to this in a few years and see who was right. | | |
| ▲ | iamnothere 41 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Sure, well, multiple Courts have ruled several times in different ways against warrantless mass surveillance, so unless you’re planning to stack the Court, my money is on them remaining consistent here. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | estearum 17 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Nope. United States v Jones already answered this question. |
