Remix.run Logo
jfrbfbreudh 2 hours ago

I think it’s hard to appreciate the capabilities of Fable unless you’ve run into a problem that you’ve spent days trying to get Opus to solve, but couldn’t.

GPT5.5 is better than Opus 4.* at everything except frontend, but Fable is good enough that I instantly re-subscribed to the $200 plan despite knowing that it’s just short-term limited access.

chasd00 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> ..you’ve run into a problem that you’ve spent days trying to get Opus to solve

do you have an example of this? If i can't get an agent to do something in a couple hours i do it myself.

jfrbfbreudh 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Many, but I think that the model delta is only meaningfully convincing when experienced firsthand.

Here’s an example of improvement when trying to solve the label placement problem (NP-hard):

https://imgur.com/a/kCUZxPi

It’s also an example of something that I could not (and would not bother trying to) code up a solution / heuristic for.

kittoes 7 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Not the OP, but I had Fable orchestrate this project.

https://github.com/ByteTerrace/Puck

It has required constant hand holding, and there was the outage to deal with, but I can't argue with the end results. A fully deterministic recursive engine within an engine framework that includes a rendering VM, emulators, custom ROMs, and an in-game editor? Insane. Sure, it's nowhere near primetime but this kind of thing was unimaginable just a year ago.

hajile 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is like when a vacuum doesn’t pick something up after a few tries. The user picks the thing up, looks at it, then puts it back down and tries again until they finally give up and move it to the trash.

If you can’t design a solution and instead waste days and who knows how much money in tokens instead of just turning on your brain for a few minutes, you are in the wrong profession.

yodsanklai 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Funny how the two top comments are contradictory. We need better than anecdotes to understand what the new models bring.

jchanimal an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Since Fable, my legit infrastructure project has turned into the sort of thing I can do 95% on my phone. It’s reliable enough instead of doing big reviews, I’ve just been giving it smaller tasks, and dozens in parallel.

I created a skill that’s focused on getting PRs merge-ready, and now my attention is fully back where it should be, on deciding what changes will make the product better.

Our entire stack is Apache 2.0 open source, including the agent docs, so if you wanna try sitting at a higher level of abstraction, install the skill in your repo or just clone our whole project and start adding features: https://good.vibes.diy/blog/beast-mode-skill-for-claude-code

dimitrios1 an hour ago | parent [-]

This reads like a paid testimonial.

jchanimal an hour ago | parent | next [-]

If by that you mean I paid a lot to learn this. But at least I typed it with my own two hands.

dimitrios1 11 minutes ago | parent [-]

I am glad! But you are indeed selling your own product here, correct?

aerhardt an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

The website linked is an utter mess. In design and performance.

jfrbfbreudh an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I didn’t mention my case since it’s quite esoteric, but I am working on an application using the Apple RoomPlan API, which is very powerful but very limited in customizability. Opus simply couldn’t alter the scanning view for me, it would try things over and over and eventually started making up parameters and passing them hoping it would work.

Completely failed, but I knew it was possible because a competitor app does it.

Fable also failed, then added log lines (as did Opus, but Opus failed to do anything useful with them) and then reversed engineered the API, and made it work.

neon_diogenes an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Here’s one difference I have seen. I forgot I had a multi-session audio probe running while trying to repro audio glitches, and Fable came back with: “your pops are already on tape.”

Interesting choice of words. Phrased so casually. It picked a low-tech idiom that fit the situation instead of giving some sterile technical answer. That kind of language and context awareness never happened for me with Opus, or gpt 5.5.

cyanydeez an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

you're living in the age of AI; not AGI. Also, there's pretty much zero moderation on HN, so astroturfing is likely streaming through just as bad as reddit. It' sjust noit as obvious because it's a smaller scoped website.

tiffanyh an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My experience comparing GPT-5.5 and Fable:

GPT-5.5 is better for: - Strategic thinking - Long-form writing, including essays and white papers - Image creation - Code generation

Fable is better for: - Using tools - Testing code - Working in live environments - Making changes to existing software - Creating polished PowerPoint and Word documents

Fable’s tool access is its biggest advantage. It's hard to describe but Fable ability to access sandbox environments with way more tooling can quickly become a superpower in now workflows.

talon8635 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

We’ve really evolved quickly into simple vectors for a magical tool that solves our problems. Can’t solve the problem? There’ll be a new release soon that can!