| ▲ | sarchertech 2 hours ago | |||||||
Is there something specific you wanted to do that was prohibited by a license. I thought most of the licenses you’re talking about just prohibited you from reselling the database as a service. | ||||||||
| ▲ | PaulHoule 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
A client introduced me to Arangodb which I felt was a "secret weapon" that I used for a lot of side projects. Then this came out https://arango.ai/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/ADB-Community-L... and it is dead to me. I want my head! I can accept GPL, Apache, MIT or some legit open source license. For my projects I see two possible paths which I want to have open: (1) building a commercial service on top of a database (like my RSS reader) where you can't necessarily draw a clear line between what is allowed and what is not allowed, for instance I have an adaptation layer that makes postgres look like the part of arangodb that I actually use (I do manually rewrite AQL queries into a DSL that extends AlchemyAPI) and if I did something similar over arango is this reselling? (2) an open source project where I want to tell people "go forth and use this code" and not have to hire a lawyer to know what they can and can't do. Once a vendor has shown they have this attitude, I expect them to change their license for the worse in the future -- I just don't want to invest my time and energy in their platform. | ||||||||
| ▲ | throwaway7356 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Yes, that condition makes it no longer open source software. It also has the effect of making software adopting such licenses getting removed from open source distributions. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ubercore 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It's also postgres, but timescaledb's licensing (and therefore its lack of good support in azure managed postgres) is a bummer. | ||||||||