> That's a common meme but it's the opposite of true.

But you're restating what I just wrote - We're training a status quo machine and the probability of anything outside that distribution rapidly drops to zero.

I'm saying that the models have to be trained better for them to be considered creative. Looking at how many low hanging fruits there are in AI right now, I'd say it's possible given enough time and slow enough adoption. Looking at how little the AI labs and everyone else are interested in those low-hanging fruits and how much they're focused on politics, hype, and safety religion, I'm not optimistic.