[flagged]

embedding-shape an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Being in an animal suit is "act out sex fetishes in public" because that same suit might be used later in connection with sexual activities? Doesn't that make every heterosexual couples clothes also "acting out sex fetishes in public" somehow then?

▲

thin_carapace an hour ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

	▲	bschwindHN 29 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> i can't play devil's advocate for intentionally doing that around kids. I can't even maintain good faith anymore, next time I see that shit I'm putting a stop to it, unless one of you can convince me not to. We're gonna see some bad headlines coming from this guy's local Charles E. Cheese real soon...

▲

koolala 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Why do you think this has anything to do with the article? No one needs to endulge your bigotry.

	▲	thin_carapace 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		genuinely curious as to what makes people think it's okay to publicly engage in behaviour directly linked to a sexual fetish which links to the article as per the grandparent comment. I specified around the kids because furries near me go out of their way to have their parties exactly where kids have their parties. nobody has to respond to me, that's true. nobody has to call me names either yet here you are.