> Three names, one thing. That’s why they blur together.

Stopped reading here. This is an AI article.

Just to play devil's advocate: why? There's nothing a priori that suggests AI-written content is less pedagogically sound than human written content?

	▲	empthought 9 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		We don’t need aggregators like HN pitching AI-authored content, no matter how pedagogically sound. We can direct our own AIs to generate our own AI-authored content.
	▲	WD-42 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Because the style is irritating, and as usual: if the author can't be bothered to write it, I can't be bothered to read it.

JSR_FDED 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Thanks