| ▲ | z_open 14 hours ago | |
I can't imagine judges would normally except this especially since it seems to be a known way to skirt law. | ||
| ▲ | nfw2 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
It's not a legal defense strategy, it's a social engineering strategy | ||
| ▲ | steego 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
If nobody brings forward a lawsuit in the first place, why would there be a judge? | ||
| ▲ | kelnos 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
The judge doesn't accept it, and the Wikipedia page points out that this isn't a good legal strategy for that reason. But it can be a good social-engineering strategy: the "rule" is based on the hope that the person on the other end of it won't bring legal action in the first place, for fear of socially confirming their association with a small-penis'd character. | ||
| ▲ | tarpitt 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I think the point is that you can apply it to any shameful-enough aspect of the libel/parody. | ||