OK it took a while to get to the point, but Zuck claiming that Wynn-Williams sitting silently on stage during a panel constitutes "disparagement" is farcical if not straight-up evil

▲

snek_case 7 hours ago | parent [-]

It looks weirdly petty that they are going after her. Everyone knows that Meta is a shitty place to work. There have already been countless articles. Their reputation as an employer is almost Amazon-tier. Is there much point in trying to silence one person?

	▲	conartist6 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		No, there's really not. That's why it's self-evident to me that their goal is to send a message to any other employee thinking about following her lead