This article was AI generated and a waste of time. So many obvious LLM patterns that I stopped reading 10% of the way down the page.

▲

iamflimflam1 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Agreed - having played a lot with AI content generation - it's impossible not to recognise it.

What's annoying is that you can put effort in and de-AI something. But it takes work. And no one wants to put the time in.

	▲	inigyou 34 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		A perfect mirror of the whole blogging-for-money space then

▲

Hard_Space 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, it was polluted with multiple 'Not just [x] but [y]' examples - the most obvious tell of AI-generated text, among other aggravating examples. It was hard to read, but I was interested enough in the subject to slog through it.

▲

pessimizer 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

https://www.salahadawi.com/hacker-news-ai-detector/the-great...

> We believe that this document is a mix of AI-generated, and human-written content: 78% AI likelihood