| ▲ | graemep a day ago | |
How is that a reason to exclude it from the graph? Surely including it in the charts would strengthen the case for regarding it as a long term problem? Excluding it subtly suggests that global warming is a short term phenomenon. | ||
| ▲ | tasuki a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
I agree with you that it's a long term problem. I won't stop until London is under a mile-high glacier! | ||
| ▲ | hdgvhicv a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
There you go 20,000 years enough? | ||