| ▲ | memoriyato3 4 days ago |
| having E2E encryption is a marketing feature, you need it if you want to be competitive in the market, so this is another incentive to add it |
|
| ▲ | archerx 4 days ago | parent [-] |
| I never believed that the messages were truly E2E encrypted and I know for sure when WhatsApp retroactively censored a message I sent to a friend a while back, I found that super sus. |
| |
| ▲ | beng-nl 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Can you be sure WhatsApp retroactively censored a message? Implying someone else but the direct recipient could read and delete/change it? (I believe group chats are different, forgot the details.) I don’t want to be dismissive but.. well i dont believe this is the best explanation given just these observations. | | |
| ▲ | archerx 3 days ago | parent [-] | | It said the message was removed for violating some rule or something. The message was a link to a website meta does not approve of but it was removed like a day later. | | |
| ▲ | beng-nl 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Wow, that is honestly a bit freaky - first I’ve heard of anything like that. I will assume it was a client side action, but still horribly invasive if that’s how it went. I’ll try to find more about this possibility. |
|
|
|
