| ▲ | BadCookie 7 hours ago | |||||||
Or people who were remote got called back to the office. Or they lost their job while living elsewhere and had to move to the Bay to find a new one. An increase in the net number of jobs is not the only possible explanation. The jobs might just be changing their geographic requirements. Anecdotally, I know one couple who is selling their house to move back to a tech hub for better job opportunities. Another couple working from a rural location recently had one partner lose their big tech job. If the laid-off partner doesn’t get a new job in the next few months, I expect that they will start talking about moving, too. | ||||||||
| ▲ | petilon 7 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> Or people who were remote got called back to the office. That's not the explanation according to this article [1]. > Or they lost their job while living elsewhere and had to move to the Bay to find a new one. It is hard to afford Bay Area rents -- even if you have a job. I can't see someone looking for a job signing a 1-year lease at these rates. Also, unlike the old days, interviews are remote, being physically present in the Bay Area doesn't give you an advantage. [1] https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/remote-work-stab... | ||||||||
| ||||||||