But the goal of an encyclopedia is to inform people on things that it covers, isn't it? It's quite broad with Wikipedia but still... The language clearly exists, it's not a student project, it's is use, people are interested in it. So the page was created, but is now removed because of formalities (the lack of good enough sources).

> But the goal of an encyclopedia is to inform people on things that it covers, isn't it?

Yes, but that implies filtering on all things that are false. And in this day and age, filtering truth is a very hard thing to do, so instead they set the bar a little higher at “a reputable source checked that it is indeed true”. As a result, there's plenty of things that are both true and well known to plenty of people that aren't on Wikipedia, but that's fine, and encyclopedia doesn't need to be exhaustive to be useful.

But on the flip side, if they didn't, it would soon be filled by tons of made up things fabricated for marketing reasons.

Note the bad faith of your correspondent:

> As a reader thank god not everything that has grabbed the attention of social media gets an article.

...

> what I want doesn't matter for an encyclopedia.