| ▲ | calibas an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||
The largest tree on record is rejected in part because it's over the theoretical limit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nooksack_Giant Too bad we cut it down, along with almost every other giant Douglas-fir. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Alien1Being 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Human barbarism is not new... "The placard recorded that the Nooksack tree produced 96,345 board feet (227.348 cubic meters) of the "finest quality" lumber. The New York Times regarded the tree in a March 7, 1897 issue as the "most magnificent fir tree ever beheld by human eyes" and called its destruction a "truly pitiable tale" and a "crime". The Morning Times of February 28, 1897 claimed that the wood, sawed into one-inch strips, would reach from "Whatcom [the tree's location] to China"." | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hinkley an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
There are stories that the moss on trees in temperate rainforests allow the tree to pull water from their branches instead of the ground, increasing their max height. For a while there were people poaching the moss that facilitated this, which is a problem because it grows only inches per year. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||