Remix.run Logo
Havoc 2 hours ago

>one of the primary reasons it has not been allowed in South Africa.

That's just nonsense. The regulator has been very clear on what the hold up is. A ECNS license is needed, which in turn requires 30% black ownership which musky boy isn't willing to do and isn't likely to change his mind on given his stance on DEI.

That's why the communication minister tried to create an alternative pathway around the 30% requirement

https://www.businessday.co.za/companies/2025-12-12-starlink-...

drnick1 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> requires 30% black ownership

What an absurd requirement.

dreambuffer 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The goal is to hedge national security risk by giving ownership of key industries to native South Africans and especially those who have historically been denied economic opportunities by the apartheid government.

486sx33 2 hours ago | parent [-]

[dead]

HWR_14 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> requires 30% black ownership

Of SpaceX or of a special South African Starlink reseller that SpaceX owns 70% of?

dreambuffer 2 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

dreambuffer 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

B-BEEE exists as a kind of "national security risk insurance", that is why it is only applied to sectors like Telecomms and Mining. So my statement is not incorrect.

consensus1 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Why would he give up ownership to someone who did absolutely nothing of value? That's a shakedown. It's like the laws that keep Tesla from selling cars in some states because they require a stealership as middle man.

dreambuffer 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Starlink is allowed to choose who they partner with. They will go through a lengthy process to pick partners that align with their business, including value propositions.