| ▲ | joe_the_user 9 hours ago | |
The study is two months old (March 13, 2026). Edit: Also, it's about writing not coding and it's point isn't that time isn't saved but even with time saved at the task, you don't get a broad decrease in total worked time for many/most workers. | ||
| ▲ | czinck 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
The study was published in May 2025, and then revised in March 2026. It's based on data through December 2024, so virtually useless for saying anything about today. Given that, I actually think the conclusions of the article are backwards. If the gpt-4/gpt-4o era had a measurable 3% improvement in productivity, how much more improvement are we getting from models today that are way way better? | ||
| ▲ | strangescript 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
The study is "new", but the data they are using is old. It has references GPT-4 for god sake. | ||
| ▲ | mythrwy 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Right but it looks back well before that. | ||