Of course? I'm still better than sonnet or opus, just slower and much more expensive.

Sometimes it takes me a day or more to find the one line fix or abstraction necessary, while claude can hammer through a hundred line fix in under an hour.

▲

qup 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Sounds like your definition of better is pretty narrow.

Quick and cheap are two of the three fabled: "Fast, cheap, and good: choose two"

▲

AlotOfReading 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

"good" can take lots of different meanings. Generally though, I want as little code as I can get away with. A majority of code lifecycle cost isn't in writing it.

▲

6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

dofm 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are you perhaps missing the true message of that aphorism?

Or are you saying the industry is (because it is)

▲

wavemode 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Huh? The word "better" is the comparative form of the adjective "good". Or did you misunderstand the comment you're replying to?

▲

twister2920 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"more good" seems like a pretty decent definition of better to me. The words you are looking for are "cheaper" and "faster"

	▲	qup 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		In coding we usually change it to "cheap, fast or correct: choose two" I reject your correction: I present the options as nouns, not modifiers to the work. Maybe I should say "Cheap, Fast, or Good" as a compromise.