| ▲ | Aurornis an hour ago | |||||||||||||
> It'll almost certainly be worth it, given the abusive behavior we've seen and will continue to see from the major closed-model providers. The proper financial comparison for GLM-5.2 would be one of the providers on OpenRouter or renting a server as needed. Compare apples to apples. You will almost certainly never break even compared to paying per token. Local LLMs at this scale are only worth it if you have extremely strict requirements that data not leave the premises. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jobeirne an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Or if you want to hedge against the various tail risks of third-party providers raising prices or denying you service or somehow abusing your data... | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | CamperBob2 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Also agreed, it's definitely a sucker's game to run a high-end model locally, by any objective measure. Still... if it's not your weights, running on your box, you're always going to be behind somebody else's 8-ball. Everybody has to decide for themselves where their priorities lie. | ||||||||||||||