| ▲ | ladberg 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Why? Don't you prefer getting better prices when you want to go buy a stock? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fluoridation 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I prefer a better price delta between buy and sell, which is blind to price hikes across the board. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stouset an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The argument is not that you get better prices, it’s that you get accurate prices. First, this definition has always been circular: what’s the most accurate price? The one the market comes up with. More market, more accuracy! Second, there is never any reconciliation of the costs society is saddled with in order to chase arbitrarily more accurate prices, the most obvious of which is the massive quantity of fat skimmed off by the financial services sector. Third, as an index investor, I more or less couldn’t care less. This hyperfixation on accuracy only really matters to people who are actively trading, which is already a fool’s game. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||