So you don’t actually care, you just want them punished out of spite because some other guy was for doing something similar but not the same?

▲

matheusmoreira 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Correct. I'm one of the copyright abolitionists the other person alluded to. It's the selective enforcement that's disgusting.

I mean, what is this? Their balls suddenly drop off? They only have the audacity to prosecute random people? Smaller companies? When they're up against trillion dollar AI companies they suddenly become cowards? That's so incredibly disgusting, and it made me completely lose even the small amount of respect for copyright that I had managed to rationalize over the years.

▲

phoghed 4 hours ago | parent [-]

So you believe a dude was wrongly punished, and to you justice would be for everyone else to also be wrongly punished? Kind of dumb tbh

▲

matheusmoreira 4 hours ago | parent [-]

My mind is not capable of the cognitive dissonance necessary to accept that billionaires get a slap on the wrist while mere mortals get police helicopters descending upon them. In order to maintain my mental health, I must have consistency.

So either enforce the law the same way against everyone correctly and proportionally, or your law and its enforcement are illegitimate and shouldn't exist. If some activity is harmless enough for some billionaires to do at massive scales and settle in court like it was some footnote in history, then nobody should be punished for it at all.

	▲	phoghed an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Brother Kim Dotcom was worth about $200,000,000