[flagged]

adjejmxbdjdn 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Dogs kill about 30-50 people in the U.S. every year.

Intimate partner gun violence alone leads to about 700 women being killed every year.

So by your logic, if you’re a woman and your partner has a gun, and is walking towards you and you can’t clearly tell that they don’t have a gun on them, “they just want to give you a kiss before leaving home” isn’t an argument. They’re vermin that can kill you and you’re absolutely allowed to play it safe, defend yourself and shoot them.

▲

duk3luk3 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes, that sounds appropriate and proportional to me, given the massive danger posed to (mostly) women by mostly (men) regarding domestic violence.

▲

dullcrisp 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Cars kill 40,000 people I just shoot for the tires though.

▲

rjsw 6 hours ago | parent [-]

There are cartridges specifically designed for shooting cars.

▲

drob518 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Like what?

	▲	rjsw 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Like this [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.50_Beowulf

▲

bebe9494i4 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think better analogy would be a drunken partner, loudly shouting "i will cut you", and chasing you with a knife, when you try to run away.

But you are forgetting one major thing: dogs are not people!

▲

cindyllm 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲

syrgian 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I am a dog owner, and I agree that a loose and aggressive dog is a liability to humanity and you are making everyone a favor if you kill it even if you could have escaped (e.g. you manage to get into your car in time). If it was attacking you, it could be a child (or another dog, too) next time. I would say that even a loose, non aggressive dog of a breed that is very statistically likely to mangle people (e.g. Bully XL) should be taken away from their owners that same day.

▲

amarant 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

As a fellow dog owner I feel obligated to point out that not all barking is aggressive.

People not used to dogs often seem to think it is, and I'd hate for people to start shooting dogs just because they bark. Dogs bark, it's what they do.

	▲	bebe9494i4 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Maybe we just do not give a damm if its agressive, or teritorial or reactive barking? The dog will bite anyway. Or maybe it is just horny and wants a quickie humping? Do not care, not interested! Like we are suppose to guess that tail wagging at 1.5hz with 10 degree amplitude is safe (but only if ears are not raised)? Or that running away is bad? It is just a trap to blame victim for "provoking" an attack. Dog should be secured and on leash, that is what responsible dog owners do!

▲

05 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think there should be mandatory courses the owner needs to take to own these breeds (and pass the exam with satisfactory marks), loose or not if one slip of a leash can lead to a kid getting mangled then it's not safe for the owner to walk even a leashed untrained dog.

▲

qwertytyyuu 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

But like don't going around shooting dogs people ask your child not to pet

▲

jdkwxnkwxnsk 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Now this is certainly a take. A bad one, surely, but a take nonetheless.

Don’t pet strange dogs. Don’t let your children pet strange dogs. Don’t mess with animals you don’t know unless you’re willing to risk being bitten or worse. Simple as that.

	▲	bebe9494i4 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Simple as that. Can I run away? Or is that me "messing" with strange animal and initiating a conflict? Can I walk on "their teritory" (also known as public street or park)? Or is there some broken rule here? What if dog is really really horny, and wants small dog I am carrying? > willing to risk being bitten or worse I am not willing to risk that. I will not allow that! Simple as that!