| ▲ | afandian 6 hours ago | |||||||
The innovation here is clearly edible soap. And the 'less water' claim is technically correct, but it doesn't mention the decamethylcyclopentasiloxane. Just because it's complicated to spell, you understand. | ||||||||
| ▲ | broken-kebab 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
>edible soap Sodium bicarbonate residue won't kill our customers, so consider it technically edible. The issue of taste and efficiency will be approached after MVP | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | jodrellblank 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
from L'Affaire Siloxane? ( https://mceglowski.substack.com/p/laffaire-siloxane ) (subtitle: "How antiperspirant fumes nearly got NASA to evacuate the space station") | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | pyrale 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Edible soap?! The solution is clearly edible dishes! | ||||||||
| ||||||||