> The burden of proof seems like it's actually on you to show why this current tech boom is any different from previous ones.

In past tech advances, there was always a long list of things that could not be automated by a machine.

For some visions of "AI", almost by definition there is nothing left in that list.

(Except some things, of course, where people want to interact with a human).

>For some visions of "AI", almost by definition there is nothing left in that list.

>(Except some things, of course, where people want to interact with a human).

And, of course, the things that the person holding the vision thinks they personally will still be doing. ;)