| ▲ | ghaff 8 hours ago |
| My guess is that it's simultaneously easy for a lot of companies to do automated filtering and for candidates to do a lot of automated applications in a way that's easier than sending out a bunch of envelopes. Which makes it harder for candidates who don't have either networks or impressive credentials. |
|
| ▲ | laughing_man 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| On the other side, I notice it's so much easier to apply for a job today that people apply for thousands of jobs. When I graduated from college I applied at 70 different places, and my peer group thought that was a crazy high number. |
| |
| ▲ | ghaff 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | When I was graduating from grad school I certainly sent many dozens of letters. Which I think was pretty typical. When I went to another grad school a few years later, I probably traveled to a good dozen interviews in addition to a whole bunch of other letters. |
|
|
| ▲ | rwmj 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I wonder if there'd be some value to only taking job applications by post. |
| |
| ▲ | mattnewton 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There are plenty of services to send mail form the internet for a small fee, so this will only discourage the most poor candidates and add friction for the best ones. | | |
| ▲ | ghaff 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't know what the options are these days but MCI used to do it. Yeah, it's some friction on both sides. |
| |
| ▲ | ghaff 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | An interesting question but arguably a lot of the most qualified applicants will go FU at that point and only the most desperate will put a stamp on an envelope which is probably not what you want. Honestly, it probably comes down to more networking and credentials. |
|