> Are you arguing against the existence of an objective reality? Seems a little extreme.

No, I am not arguing against the existence of an objective reality. I argue against the capability of most people to accurately assess what that objective reality is. You for example apparently cannot even assess the meaning of my clear and simple sentence, why would I trust you to be able to assess any more complex situation?

▲

khalic 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Nobody’s asking you to trust peoples’ assessments, this is why reproduction exists in science.

Your sentence was very much ambiguous, you should think before writing

▲

auggierose 10 hours ago | parent [-]

There is nothing ambiguous about my sentence. Once you learnt thinking, read it again.

	▲	khalic 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If you can't find the issue with your statement, you should probably not be giving anybody lessons about thinking or learning...