| ▲ | scriptsmith 7 hours ago | |||||||
Is GitHub Copilot the best positioned platform for enterprise? They support Claude, GPT, Gemini, and now even open weight models. Larger orgs are paying at API rates anyway so it costs just as much as anywhere else. They have a pretty good agent CLI and SDK, and now a desktop app. They have hosted agents, and you can run their 'Agentic Workflows' in CI. Has their reputation tanked so much that the alternatives get all the buzz? Or is it that non-enterprise users are priced out by the usage costs, so no free marketing? | ||||||||
| ▲ | gunalx 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The rugpull with the pricing change without further notice was not taken kindly by enterprice. | ||||||||
| ▲ | theplumber 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
For some reasons compilot seems dummer than vscode Claude or vscode codex. I can’t tell what’s the exact reason but it didn’t feel right | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | attentive 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
They were, until they decided to commit suicide for the service. | ||||||||
| ▲ | lbreakjai 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
We just cancelled everyone's plans and rolled liteLLM out internally. We kept it for the insanely cheap tokens, but now that they've switched to the new pricing, they're just like openrouter, just with far fewer models. | ||||||||
| ▲ | kasey_junk 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Their harness is terrible compared to any of the other cli based harnesses I test against. Like shockingly bad. This comes up all the time at work because the vendor management people don’t understand the llm ecosystem and think Claude through copilot is the same as Claude through Claude code. A simple side by side comparison will show dramatic under performance 3 or 4 times out of five when I’m asked to explain the difference. | ||||||||