Lots of societies who started with some killing “for the common good” ended in atrocities.

The statistics on men under 25 are still horrific and suggest this was in fact the latter category: atrocity masquerading behind that euphemism.

▲

InsideOutSanta 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Do you apply that same standard to other things, like cars? Do you feel allowing people to drive is also society "killing for the common good"?

After more than eight billion doses of the vaccine, about twenty deaths were causally linked to the vaccine. Five times as many people die every day from traffic in the US alone, many of them children.

What about gun ownership? How many people does that "kill for the common good"?

And by that measure, isn't not vaccinating people an even bigger atrocity? Aren't you also arguing to kill people "for the common good" by not mandating vaccination?

▲

LMYahooTFY an hour ago | parent [-]

Cars and gun ownership were not mandated by the government.

▲

InsideOutSanta an hour ago | parent [-]

Yes, they are. I'm mandated by the government to live in a country that has cars and gun ownership.

▲

defrost an hour ago | parent [-]

Your government refuses to let you leave the country?

That aside, they also command you to own both a car and a gun?

▲

InsideOutSanta an hour ago | parent [-]

> Your government refuses to let you leave the country?

This argument also applies to you: by your logic, vaccine mandates are perfectly fine because you can leave the country.

> That aside, they also command you to own both a car and a gun?

The problem isn't me owning a car and gun, the problem is obviously everybody else. I'm rather unlikely to drive into myself while driving my own car.

▲

defrost 41 minutes ago | parent [-]

First up, for clarity, I have no issues with COVID vaccines and how they were used in Australia - the very few cases of myocarditis were mild and resulted in no deaths.

Second up, I'm confused by your use of "mandate" and how your government mandates you to remain in that country.

> by your logic, vaccine mandates are perfectly fine because you can leave the country.

Not by my logic, nor that of Dana Scott, Christopher Strachey , Alonzo Church or others.

> I'm rather unlikely to drive into myself while driving my own car.

You can drive into a wall or off a cliff, and yes, injured by own car (or tractor) is an actual not infrequent injury.

	▲	InsideOutSanta 7 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> how your government mandates you to remain in that country I never said that. I said that government inaction is also a mandate; look at the context for my comment. If you're arguing that leaving the country makes government action (or inaction) acceptable, then by your own logic, all government action (or inaction) is acceptable, which supports my point: vaccine mandates are fine, because by your own logic, if you disagree with them, you can leave the country. > You can drive into a wall or off a cliff, and yes, injured by own car (or tractor) is an actual not infrequent injury. You're missing the point I'm making, which is that not driving a car does not mean I won't get run over by other people, which is the actual point I brought up. To be honest, I'm not quite sure why you're responding to me, since you don't seem to be arguing against anything I actually said?