| ▲ | s1artibartfast 3 hours ago |
| Sounds like a oppurtunity for health educatation.
99%+ of people dont know they can look in the USPI for this data.
However, it isnt the best and most up to date, which the regulator and FDA would have and are unlikely to share. |
|
| ▲ | estearum 3 hours ago | parent [-] |
| 100% of people who Google something like "how do we know the covid vaccines are good" would discover that the tool we use to figure that out is called a "clinical trial." Then they can look up "covid vaccine clinical trial results." The reality is none of these "do your own research" or "just asking questions" people are actually curious whatsoever. Curiosity requires more than zero effort. Simply saying you're "doing your own research" and "just asking questions" while regurgitating the last thing you saw on your TikTok feed is super easy and gives you all the same sense of intellectual superiority. |
| |
| ▲ | smallstepforman 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The rushed clinical trials were only done with 122 people and a control group. During the very short trial, 1 person died in the first group, 2 in the other. The “conclusion” was its better to be vaccinated and it protects you better. 12 months later AstraZenica vaccine pulled from market everywhere …. | | | |
| ▲ | s1artibartfast 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Im not sure what point you are making.
Are you opposed to public health agencies sharing science based facts and helping people find the data? | | |
| ▲ | estearum 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | No? My point is the data is all available and always has been. | | |
| ▲ | s1artibartfast 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Some data is, some isnt. Most people dont look for it and public health communications isnt data focused. Nobody was was claiming that people cant google. I dont know why you bring this up as a gotcha when someone said public health communications should share more data. |
|
|
|
