Sure - that's always valid - but now I know I'm no longer interested before having put the legwork in! A cool security project that has been reviewed multiple ways already is one thing, a C project nobody else (even the author) was very involved with is another. I don't need to put the legwork in on this codebase to know it's not worth putting the manual legwork in for because I can already get such unverified things out of AI the same as the author, so i'd just review my projects the same as you'd review yours. That's what the proxy provided, not an override of an actual review.

That's the spirit. I was thinking about this that you are saying in general, and agents now make for a case that it's often better for you to rollout your own specialized solution than to adopt a more generic project, so it's really important to know when not to waste time with a project like this.

I am currently doing DevOps work describing a legacy infrastructure as code and instead of buying into a paid or opensource tool, it's nicer for me to roll out my own because even though the task isn't trivial, I can custom tailor the solution exactly to how I'm going to use it to conduct the project.