| ▲ | LaurensBER 4 hours ago |
| They might be sending some user requests to Anthropic to gather trading data for their own models. If they do so, perhaps they need to add some tracer to request that they prefer to hide. |
|
| ▲ | fwip 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Wireshark would catch that easy-peasy. |
| |
| ▲ | benatkin 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The request would need to be done from their service, so as not to expose the API key, and because it just makes sense. They could probably directly proxy it and Wireshark couldn't catch it, due to everything being HTTPS. But people could probably catch it by decompiling, so it would make more sense to have the server make the request as part of a GLM request. Not that I think this is plausible - I'm not sure. |
|
|
| ▲ | bogdan 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Source? Or is it "trust me bro"? |
| |
| ▲ | DonsDiscountGas 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | "might" means pure speculation | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Literally just FUD unless someone has code to point at. | | |
| ▲ | anakaine 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Verbally minimising potential threats is not a valid approach to managing risk. We have seen mass misuse of tokens acquired through nefarious means to distill models and enhance training as a way of catching up recently, among other related issues. It is quite appropriate to wonder what else might be going on. | | |
| ▲ | _aavaa_ 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Those nefarious distillers, only we are allowed to freely distill the world’s knowledge into our paid products |
|
|
|