Remix.run Logo
_davide_ a day ago

"promotion" like they are doing you a favor just this once out of their goodwill... Really really really pissed me off

countcol a day ago | parent | next [-]

This seems like the most normal use of the term that I could imagine..?

user43928 a day ago | parent | next [-]

The wording on initial launch was:

"For subscription plans, we’d rather give access sooner than later, so we’re rolling out more conservatively, in stages:

From today through June 22, Fable 5 is included on Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans at no extra cost.

On June 23, we’ll remove Fable 5 from those plans. Using it after that will require usage credits.

If capacity allows, we’ll extend the included window. After this point—when sufficient capacity allows us to do so—we aim to restore Fable 5 as a standard part of subscription plans. We intend to do this as quickly as we can."

Now it's a "promotion" that we get to access to Fable for 9 days instead of the original 14 days announced. They are generously throwing in a special halving of the usage "at no extra cost", and freely admit that their classifier is broken and will need to be improved.

Well thanks!

wongarsu a day ago | parent [-]

Everyone did get the first 7 of the original 14 days before the export ban. Now everyone gets another 7 days. Limiting it to half the weekly limit stings, but if you have a quota reset in the middle of it you still get effectively one weekly limit. (does everyone's quota now reset on Saturdays?)

yreg a day ago | parent | next [-]

> Everyone did get the first 7 of the original 14 days

It was restricted after 3 days.

rainwolf a day ago | parent | prev [-]

my quota reset every time they release (or pull) a new model, pretty sweet

_davide_ a day ago | parent | prev [-]

It isn't a promotion, it's 2x the parameters of opus and we are paying with 2x the consumption rate. They just want to get rid of the subscription model.

unreal6 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I regret having signed up for an annual plan at this point; the rug-pulls are increasingly irksome.

osti a day ago | parent | next [-]

I think at the current stage of LLM, it just doesn't make sense to ever have an annual sub. Things change too quickly that you really don't want to be stuck with one model.

joshstrange 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Last I checked they only offered annual plans for their $20/mo tier. Given how fast Fable ran out my entire 5hr block on the $100/mo tier, I’d be surprised if you can have more than a couple exchanges with Fable before it’d exhaust the $20/mo tier.

skerit a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Before Fable got pulled, they claimed their goal really was to keep it around in the subscriptions in some way, they just didn't know when it would return. This time there isn't even a single mention of this. It's just "This is a promotion, and it's going away". Like how the hell can this corporation be so fucking bad at communication?