| ▲ | throwawayk7h 6 hours ago | |
If fable 5 can't do code... what are people using it for? | ||
| ▲ | xg15 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Was wondering the same. So coding, debugging and anything that has to do with cybersecurity or LLM development is blocked. What tasks are left in which Fable 5 is meaningfully better than the predecessors? | ||
| ▲ | exabrial 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It's beginning to look like giant publicity stunts. A model that can't do what it says it can, overhyped, no way to test. | ||
| ▲ | dude250711 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It's good for pre-IPO PR. You drop a good old "A new {cool_word}-class model.". And boom! What are you competitors going to do? Use same classification nomenclature? I don't think so! IPO secured. | ||